Search for: "Matter of Barone"
Results 21 - 40
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
This activity gives the strong impression that The Sun stood by its right to publish the story; that there was an important matter of principle at stake. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
The pork barons behind this bill don’t seem to understand the world we’re living in now. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:00 am
The case of Matter of Barone v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:05 pm
Both the overall sums and the breakdown per paper are not a matter of public record. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Boadle when a man was mysteriously crushed by a falling flour barrel, Chief Baron Jonathan Frederick Pollock declared “there are certain cases of which it may be said res ipsa loquitur, and this seems one of them. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Noting that it is well settled that "judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, observed that "a court may vacate an arbitrator's award where it finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced when 'an arbitrator . . . exceeded his [or her] power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made'". [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Noting that it is well settled that "judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, observed that "a court may vacate an arbitrator's award where it finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced when 'an arbitrator . . . exceeded his [or her] power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made'". [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:06 pm
Indeed, the record evidence in this matter fails to show that Trump, Jr. had knowledge of the falsity of his tweets or that he had a subjective belief that there was a high probability his statements were false. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
This frees up government attorneys and resources for other matters. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
Given that the state refers hundreds of them for prosecution each year, it sure seems to matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:09 pm
The promise of AI has been around for decades, but it is the last three months that has finally caused an awakening so forceful, that even the legal industry understands it needs to be ready for the upcoming Age of AI. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Then there is the matter of the spouse who separates but has not yet secured a divorce. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:41 pm
Late last month, 25 former judges and government officials, legal academics and economists who are experts in antitrust and intellectual property law submitted a letter to Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter in support of the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Baron, and Lynn L. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Baron Munchausen. by Gustave Dore (thanks to Wikipedia). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:32 pm
" … [T]he allegations against Judge Moore were a matter of public concern. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
But in this case, because of the subject matter, they are all white men. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
