Search for: "Matter of Barry V." Results 21 - 40 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Barry v London Borough of Southwark [2008] EWCA Civ 1440 concerned an EEA national’s eligibility for social housing, via a Part VII application. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
On August 10, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the lower courts in the matter of Alexsandr Nikolaevich Kashin and the United States of America v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:34 am
Whether it is  Barry Bonds or OJ  (Stephens Media, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
…The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2021-01-30 appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Shar… https://t.co/JDtjfr1l2X 2020-12-22 https://t.co/oaAqZDITda 2020-12-24 Replacing Canada’s 20-Year-Old Data Protection Law https://t.co/X0hLJfqU8g 2020-12-24 https://t.co/d04WSxc8Tg 2020-12-24 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 154, Number 26: Time Limits in Respect of Matters Before the Copyright Board Regulat… https://t.co/1ZB0jqFV3S 2020-12-25 https://t.co/eqAAHQNZHL 2020-12-25 …The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-12-26 appeared first on… [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
District Court Grants Win to Authors Guild Members, Amazon Publishing, and Penguin https://t.co/pVyFjUX0Fn 2022-01-02 Data Matters Privacy Blog FTC Announces it May Pursue Rulemaking to Combat Discrimination in AI https://t.co/dl7uKlzRxD…The post Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-01-08 appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:41 am
” The case is In re Marriage of Daisy Parimoo and Asheet Awasthi, A144325.And the Cal Supremes just issued Barry v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:34 pm
A bit late reporting on In the Matter of the Paternity of: Ba.S. and Br.S; Kimberly C. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Barry, No. 19-414 (meaning “ready for patenting” for on sale bar) Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. [read post]