Search for: "Matter of Barry V."
Results 21 - 40
of 651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Music Matters One Song, Two Copyrights Trying to determine the public domain status of music can present another trap for the unwary. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
Barry Manilow wrote a song about it back when the annual gift exclusion was $3,000. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
That description applies to a law that singles out specific subject matter for differential treatment. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
But on further review, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the judgment in the FTCA case, under that act’s “judgment bar,” constitutes a complete bar to any action based on the same subject matter. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
See Connick v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Emergence of the ‘Neo-Brandeisians’ Thus, matters unfolded until the curtain began to descend on the second Obama term in 2016. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
In Coinbase v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
The best my research could uncover were: Matter of Taines v Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., where the court refused to grant the purchasing shareholders lenient payment terms based on their oppressive conduct (123 Misc 2d 529, 539 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983]); Matter of Elniski v Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc., which allowed installment payments (101 AD3d 1722, 1722 [4th Dept 2012]); and In re Rapid Recovery Enterprises, Inc., which… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
See Gillette v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Co., 497 A.2d 322, 327 (R.I. 1985); Hart v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
The parties' submissions established that respondent's denial of petitioner's FOIL request based on the public safety exemption was not "affected by an error of law" (CPLR 7803[3]; see also Public Officers Law § 87[2][f]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
The parties' submissions established that respondent's denial of petitioner's FOIL request based on the public safety exemption was not "affected by an error of law" (CPLR 7803[3]; see also Public Officers Law § 87[2][f]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
