Search for: "Matter of Bentham"
Results 21 - 40
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
A basic matter is ensuring there is, in fact, public access. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
This will be held on 17 and 18 February 2020, from 9am-6pm on both days, in the Hong Kong Alumni Room, UCL Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:47 pm
The heart of the colloquium will include a closed-door morning workshop for comments on draft articles and essays on art law (defined broadly in subject-matter, but legal-academic-scholarship in style). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 12:39 am
Sir Robin Jacob (UCL) on 20-24 April 2020, at UCL Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
But it does explain why conservative justices who oppose economic regulations of business and high tax rates on the wealthy as a matter of policy have resisted the temptation to subject such laws to serious Equal Protection review. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
In relation to the “public interest” defence, they found that the statements complained of were not on matters of public interest [50] to [58] and, moreover, that the defendant had not made out a reasonable belief that this was the case [64] to [84]. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:09 am
I decided to talk about Jeremy Bentham and Utilitarianism. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
HCJ) In Canadian case law, two Modern philosophers–specifically, two Utilitarians–John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, are overwhelmingly the most cited. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:42 am
In July this year, we saw the commencement of what is understood to be the first funded privacy breach-related representative action in Australia, funded by the largest litigation funder in Australia, IMF Bentham. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:52 am
Where Wells’s “The Time Machine,” which came out not long after, gave us pale Eloi and proletarian Morlocks, Bellamy was chiefly prescient about Amazon Prime....As Bellamy’s book progresses, power, brutality, and the capacity to dominate become all that matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
(It's possible, I suppose, that Gorsuch or others might consider all of this a form of "new property," no matter the source of the confidentiality obligation. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:52 pm
Whether or not the concern about the possible existence of conflicts of interest has substance or is a sufficient rationale to require mandatory disclosure in all situations are matters for debate. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Don't get me wrong: I think it is fine to "follow precedent" in matters that aren't of much importance. [read post]
13 May 2018, 5:31 am
My figuratively little shit Bentham-licker replied by noting that this was the foundation of utilitarianism. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:34 am
It was only a matter of time before this came up and it’s unfortunate that it came up as Facebook tries to get the “royalty deadbeat” monkey of off their back and onto Twitter’s–more on that later. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
The Act also gives the tribunal broad authority to determine procedural matters (s. 20(1)). [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 12:13 am
” In short: using System 2 thinking in patent law is a matter of life and death. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:04 pm
First, a few alleged ghosts: “What You Need to Know About Haunted-House Law” (Oct. 30, 2015); “Michael Jackson’s Ghost Testifies His Death Was an Accident” (June 16, 2013); “Millionaire Claims Ghosts Caused Him to Flee His Mortgage, I Mean Mansion” (Sept. 26, 2008); “‘As a Matter of Law, the House is Haunted‘” (Sept. 25, 2008) (the famous Stambovsky case); and “Undisclosed-Ghost Defense Asserted in Lease… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
Κ487.P65 Ρ57 2001 Ripoli, Mariangela, 1953- Itinerari della felicità: la filosofia giuspolitica di Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, John Stuart Mill. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
“I regret having to say that Judge Scalia is in error on this matter, but at least he has the satisfaction of knowing that his error is not reversible by a higher court,” said Frederick C. [read post]
