Search for: "Matter of Briggs" Results 21 - 40 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 8:21 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
It only deals with civil and commercial matters, i.e. the Brussels I Regulation, the 1968 Brussels Convention, and the two Lugano Conventions. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Timing is always important; however, in legal matters, it determines whether you can even bring a lawsuit to the courts. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:28 am
If you do nothing else this weekend, take some time to read the full decision in the matter of Santander UK Appellant and R.A. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2022 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Briggs, Hamblen and Leggatt) granted the defendant permission to appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm
BLC does not discuss any exigency in the matter that induced its improper actions. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
” Wall agreed that the court needed to defer to the government on military matters, including military justice. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 2:45 pm
    In spite of these troubling patterns, systemic discrimination by law enforcement is receiving attention due to the critical dialogue sparked by the Black Lives Matter movement. [read post]
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:07 am by Zachary Alper
However, the Federal Circuit found that the Board erred as a matter of law with respect to the motivation to combine. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am by John L. Welch
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Twenty years later Judge Parker was on the panel that heard Briggs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 10:31 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
"The Indian PositionIn India, the Supreme Court has perhaps taken a view that more-or-less accords with the minority view of Lord Briggs. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:09 am by kjacks
Of course, if his reindeer and sleigh were to damage the roof when they landed or took off that would be another matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:43 pm
Unless Conrad or her passenger can prove one of those types of injuries, they will be relegated to receiving ONLY their "no-fault benefits" (lost wages and medical benefits paid for by Conrad's no-fault insurance) and will NOT be able to claim pain and suffering compensation, or any other compensation for that matter, from Briggs or Briggs' insurance. [read post]