Search for: "Matter of Brion"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
“Absent discretion to deny a permit, an agency has no duty to conduct a CEQA review, no matter what ‘terrible environmental consequences’ an EIR might reveal. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(As a matter of disclosure, I represent the real parties, the Ohlsons, in this action.) [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
Noe Briones, 26, of Rodeo, Calif., is alleged to be a marijuana grower and one of Johnson’s regular marijuana suppliers. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
38; and (3) due process, all as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of San Juan Capistrano (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 961, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held as a matter of law that the City needed to comply with CEQA if it exercised its Elections Code § 9214(a) option of adopting the ordinance without alteration, rather than putting the measure on the ballot. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
’”); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15002(i), 15357, 15369; Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Juana Briones House v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Lynch, 803 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) (wrote opinion) Decision of Board of Immigration Appeals inIn re Briones did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2021 4th Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
