Search for: "Matter of Carroll v Carroll" Results 21 - 40 of 360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 4:09 am
  Here, the Court of Appeals noted circumstances to suggest that the Defendant had greater bargaining power.The Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal and remanded the matter to the Circuit Court to consider whether there was any misrepresentation or fraud which undermines the validity of the shortened limitations period provided in the maintenance agreement and to determine expressly whether the shortened limitations period is reasonable.The full opinion is available in PDF. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:57 am
The Carroll County Court held a lengthly hearing on the matter hearing from many experts on both sides of the fence. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]