Search for: "Matter of Caruso" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Is Creating Harsher Penalties for Protesters Yahoo News – Reid Epstein and Patricia Mazzei (New York Times) | Published: 4/21/2021 There is a wave of new anti-protest legislation, sponsored and supported by Republicans, in the 11 months since Black Lives Matter protests swept the country following the death of George Floyd. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing]). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 1:47 pm by David Oscar Markus
  She always cut through all of the nonsense and taught me (and the other lawyers in front of her) to focus on what mattered. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:58 am by SHG
And threat of COVID, no matter how false, made shoplifters untouchable. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my previous posts: A Message On The Death Of George Floyd From Dean Paul Caron (June 3, 2020) Your Voices Matter At Pepperdine Caruso Law (June 14, 2020) A Message From Pepperdine Caruso Dean Paul Caron: Our New Academic Year (Aug. 23, 2020) Invitation to Alumni to... [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Paul Stephan
These limits must reflect both the subject matter and the time period that define the emergency. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:00 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my previous post, A Message On The Death Of George Floyd From Dean Paul Caron: TO: Pepperdine Caruso Law Students FROM: Dean Paul Caron DATE: June 12, 2020 I want to express my deep appreciation for your attendance at our recent Open Conversations held over the last... [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:19 pm by David Oscar Markus
Speaking of well-written and interesting, here's an article that Federal Defender Michael Caruso wrote about the awesome Cathy Wade:At every court investiture and ceremony, no matter the honoree or occasion, there is one common denominator: a big shout out to Cathy Wade Babyak for making the event a success. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
Last night, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law hosted the first public screening of Laughing Matters, a documentary about comedians and mental health by Soul Pancake, the production company of actor/comedian Rainn Wilson (Dwight Schrute on NBC's The Office). [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Volokh's participation in this—as an amicus in this federal matter. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
Vito Caruso will oversee cases outside New York City, which will be assigned to four regionally designated judges: Justice Michael Mackey, Justice Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The purpose of the continuous representation doctrine is to avoid forcing a client to jeopardize the relationship with the attorney handling his or her case during the period that the attorney continues to represent them (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2009], af(d, 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
These special editions of the Lawfare Podcast included only the committee’s questions on and the judge’s answers to legal matters related to national security, presidential power, and presidential investigation. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
 Hart has said he is resigning from the firm over the matter. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the application of this doctrine is limited “to the course of representation concerning a specific legal matter,” and is not applicable to the client’s “continuing general relationship with a lawyer … involving only routine contact for miscellaneous legal representation … unrelated to the matter upon which the allegations of malpractice are predicated” (id. [read post]