Search for: "Matter of Dempsey v Dempsey" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am by Raffaela Wakeman
No matter the president’s party or his past failures, all Americans should want, and help, him to succeed when it comes to our national security. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
Such rhetoric is reminiscent of Chief Justice Rehnquist’s in Rostker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:08 am by Susan Brenner
It is unclear . . . whether he made this admission before or after Dempsey asked for consent to search [his] computer.U.S. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Dempsey (8th Cir. 1999) (reaching such a conclusion as to restriction on government subsidies to organizations that perform or advocate for abortions). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: SC18700 - Nelson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: SC18700 - Nelson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm by NL
This despite the clear implications that the second witness statement of WPC Dempsey had for the credibility of both Mr Tomlinson, and, seemingly crucially, Ms Morley. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm by NL
This despite the clear implications that the second witness statement of WPC Dempsey had for the credibility of both Mr Tomlinson, and, seemingly crucially, Ms Morley. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm by Melina Padron
Immigration law matters The Free Movement blog posted a short commentary on one specific aspect in the case of NA (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Section 55 of the Borders Act 2009 and enforcement measures concerning children. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This matter arose out of a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:34 pm
Matter of Dempsey v Dempsey 2010 NY Slip Op 08942 Decided on November 30, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department held that the family court properly awarded mother attorneys fees of $13,000 in a custody matter. [read post]