Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly"
Results 21 - 40
of 636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 4:16 am
Matter of Chiofalo v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
Kelly v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:03 am
Matter of Clifford v Kelly, 58 AD3d 432.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm
[The complaint also alleges that Aaron Kelly's Lynd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience, citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience, citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly, Hyde Park, appellant pro se. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly, Hyde Park, appellant pro se. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:04 am
Consider, for example, the May 31 decision in the Second Circuit matter of Kelly-Brown, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:07 pm
The Privy Council in Kelly v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
As noted above, McMillan argued that the statute “does not criminalize communication between two adults. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
Contracts * Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, Does Disclosure Matter? [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
We are discussing Wayne County Employees' Retirement System v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
