Search for: "Matter of Duffield" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 6:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
A factor in the court’s analysis was that the letter expressly referenced the possibility of litigation if the matter were not resolved. [read post]
10 May 2024, 1:33 am by David Pocklington
That application of the Duffield test to the organ is not the end of the matter because I cannot and should not ignore the fact that the instrument stands in its own right as a church treasure of considerable value both historically and musically (not to mention financially). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
It therefore fell to the Court to determine the matter, taking the letter into account. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by David Pocklington
The evidence and objections were reviewed again the Duffield questions [21] to [62]. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
  In his review of the case law, Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1; Re Jesus College Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 1; and In the Matter of Dorchester, St Peter, Holy Trinity and All Saints, [2022] ECC Sal 4, Gau Ch observed that it was clear from the diversity of decisions in these cases that any grant of a faculty was fact-specific; the test that he had to apply is set out in Re St Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 together… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
However, if he were going off for a drink or two and a good argument with his students after the lecture, he thinks the Duffield and Suthersanen would be his choice. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:16 am by Frank Cranmer
In applying the Duffield guidelines, Arlow Ch considered whether the proposals would result in harm to the special significance of the building, and how serious would that harm be [41] to [44]. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
Since then, we have posted a detailed analysis of the judgment:  the first part which was posted on 29 August; the second, including extracts from the conclusions to the Duffield questions on 5 September; and the final part, which considers the overall impact of the proposal and the court’s conclusions, on 7 September. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
Jurist’s Paper Chase blog also covers the opinion; another look comes from Todd Duffield and Hera Arson at OgletreeDeakins’ eponymous blog. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 12:45 am by David Pocklington
The petitioners analyzed their own petition on the basis of the Duffield criteria [5], although the Chancellor noted that it was doubtful that they would be considered entirely independent in doing so. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 4:51 am by David Pocklington
In cases of doubt the matter must be referred to the bishop and the minister must obey his order and direction: see Canon B 38, paragraph 6. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am by David Pocklington
Burial Act 1853 (Final) Order prohibiting further burials in: St John the Evangelist Church Churchyard, Goldenhill, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire; St Michael’s Churchyard, Stoke Gifford; St Alkmund’s Churchyard, Duffield, Derbyshire; Saint Nicolas Church Churchyard, Kings Norton, Birmingham, West Midlands; St Thomas Churchyard, Rotherham, South Yorkshire. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
However, in his judgment there was no need as such for chairs to be in a particular colour, which was a matter determined by aesthetic considerations [29]. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158, [23] to [50]. [read post]