Search for: "Matter of Duffield"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The court is bound by the principles set out in Duffield, St Alkmund [2013] Fam 158, but this is not a case where it is suggested that the intended extension would harm the character of this Grade II listed church. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:19 am
” Co-Patron of Policy Exchange’s Biology Matters Project, Rosie Duffield MP stated in the foreward of the report, “it appears the system is rotten to the core. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
Burial Act 1853 (Final) Order prohibiting further burials in: St John the Evangelist Church Churchyard, Goldenhill, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire; St Michael’s Churchyard, Stoke Gifford; St Alkmund’s Churchyard, Duffield, Derbyshire; Saint Nicolas Church Churchyard, Kings Norton, Birmingham, West Midlands; St Thomas Churchyard, Rotherham, South Yorkshire. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
The Deputy Chancellor therefore had to decide, as a preliminary matter, under Rule 10.1. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158, [23] to [50]. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:51 am
In his judgment, the Chancellor addressed the meaning of ‘serious’ in the fifth Duffield question. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
However, in his judgment there was no need as such for chairs to be in a particular colour, which was a matter determined by aesthetic considerations [29]. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:30 am
In this matter the circumstances are quite similar to those in Alsager, where both the petitioner and her late husband would be interred only a short distance, apart in the same consecrated cemetery. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 12:45 am
The petitioners analyzed their own petition on the basis of the Duffield criteria [5], although the Chancellor noted that it was doubtful that they would be considered entirely independent in doing so. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 12:30 am
In his judgment, the Chancellor addressed the meaning of ‘serious’ in the fifth Duffield question. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:16 am
In applying the Duffield guidelines, Arlow Ch considered whether the proposals would result in harm to the special significance of the building, and how serious would that harm be [41] to [44]. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:33 am
Whether or not the bells are to be removed is a matter entirely for negotiation between the Diocese, the Church Commissioners, and the Regeneration Trust. will not take effect unless and until local authority listed building consent has been obtained for the bells’ removal [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:30 am
With regard to the Duffield questions, the Worshipful David Hodge QC said: “[18]. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158, the Chancellor found that the proposals, if implemented, would not result in harm to the significance of the Church as a building of special architectural or historic interest [8]. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:30 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
Jurist’s Paper Chase blog also covers the opinion; another look comes from Todd Duffield and Hera Arson at OgletreeDeakins’ eponymous blog. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:12 am
One afternoon in late March, nine Masters of Engineering students crowded around a table in the atrium of Duffield Hall, Cornell’s nanoscale science and engineering building. [read post]
