Search for: "Matter of Frank v Stevens" Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Frank (06-580), raising the same issue that divided the Court 4-4 on Oct. 10 in New York City Board of Education v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
The main reason is the widely held belief that the Supreme Court blessed the modern massive prior restraint system in the 1980 case Snepp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 11:34 am by Eugene Volokh
And to quote the general rationale for this position, from Judge Frank Easterbrook writing in Stevens v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm by WSLL
Frank of Frank Law Office, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, for Appellees Stevens. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
[But why does that mean it should matter to the fair use analysis?] [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Steven gave an example of the Canadian Federal Court case of Lilly Icos v Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals (2006) FC 1465, where communications between Pfizer and a UK patent attorney was held not to be privileged. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice Stevens wrote the majority opinion for the Court in Parker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:51 am by South Florida Lawyers
Lautenberg and Representatives Frank Pallone Jr. and Steven R. [read post]