Search for: "Matter of Jacobs v Allen" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
In this decision (which has been labelled by many a ‘results based decision’), it clearly did not matter to the CJEU that the original licence was non-transferable. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
   This will be strictly regulated and product will need to be labelled as for export.Laëtitia Bénard Laëtitia Bénard (Allen & Overy LLP, Paris) then moved to Recent Developments on SPCs, in particular the CJEU decision in the Teva v Gilead case. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
The Respondent is represented by Mr Desmond Browne and Mr Jacob Dean. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am by David
Circuit Court of Appeals 10-10038 and International Airport Centers LLC v Jacob Citrin in the 7th U.S. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm by OK Blawg Editor - James Dee Graves
Reynolds, 1994 OK CR 54, P9, 880 P.2d 391, 394; Matter of L.N., 1980 OK CR 72, P3, 617 P.2d 239, 240.ANTHONY WAYNE JACOBS, Appellant -vs- STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AppelleeCase Number: F-2005-104COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 4; 128 P.3d 1085; 2006 Okla. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Sir Robin wants to make the payers paySir Robin Jacob (UCL) considers second medical use a very serious subject and, indeed, the biggest topic on this year's Fordham agenda. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
(“No serious congressional scholar believes that Congress speaks clearly when addressing major questions as a descriptive matter. [read post]