Search for: "Matter of James JJ."
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
On Friday, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court (Alam and Lodha JJ.) gave judgment in Fuerst Day Lawson v Jindal Exports [hereinafter “FDL”]. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (BEEZLY J. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (BEEZLY J. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Kenneth D., 213 A.D.2d 714, 624 N.Y.S.2d 455; Matter of Victor James L., 208 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 213; Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 A.D.2d 769, 565 N.Y.S.2d 136). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
In James Rose and Robert Underwood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Ceresia, JJ. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Ceresia, JJ. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Ceresia, JJ. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Lynch, Aarons, Colangelo and Ceresia, JJ. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Kenneth D., 213 A.D.2d 714, 624 N.Y.S.2d 455; Matter of Victor James L., 208 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 213; Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 A.D.2d 769, 565 N.Y.S.2d 136). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
(Bush, J., dissenting, joined by Siler and Griffin, JJ.). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
., Olson, and Wecht, JJ.) [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:16 am
James School. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Crawford, P.C., Roosevelt, NY, for petitioner.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Judith N. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
The chairperson of the CMA Board, James Croft, emailed the board to rally support for Cush. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Heard by Danilson, P.J., and Tabor and Mullins, JJ.2 MULLINS, J. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
As Thakur CJ (with Sikri and Khanwilkar JJ) put it at [105], Cole v Whitfield demonstrates that the applicability of earlier Australian authorities to the interpretation of Part XIII has ‘fizzled out’ over time – with, by implication, Indian decisions based in large part upon those Australian decisions similarly losing some measure of salience. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
., Friedman, Singh, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]