Search for: "Matter of Jennings"
Results 21 - 40
of 821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Matter of Jennings v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
Jennings v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:59 am
Delivering the matter as a nicely-wrapped gift, Jennings concludes: “We hold that the circuit court erred in its failure to strike the Commonwealth’s evidence because the DNA evidence was insufficient to prove Jennings was the person who perpetrated the robbery, since the DNA was from multiple people and there was no evidence establishing whether Jennings’ DNA was deposited on the items at the time of the robbery. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
In the matter of Mary Cairo’s will, a question has been raised whether Joseph L. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:20 am
I learned a good lesson early on during some of the political unrest around Black Lives Matter is don’t do nothing, do something. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
So what does Jennings tell us about references and § 103? [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Nor did it matter that his conduct was pure speech. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
His reading relies on last year’s Supreme Court decision in Jennings v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 3:15 am
A recently published and very interesting case note by Jens Adolphsen (Gießen) deals critically with the two recent and much discussed ECJ decisions on patent litigation - "GAT" and "Roche" - by arguing both decisions illustrated that effective infringement proceedings in intellectual property matters are not possible on the basis of the Brussels I Regulation. [...] [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:30 pm
Jen found the thought of blogging as a young PR professional a bit intimidating. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
Agence France-Presse, November 14, 2010 by Lucile Malandain http://bit.ly/dwTBFi “The reason the first drug matters so much is because… if properly administered, it will put the inmate in a state of unconsciousness where he does not feel the second and third drug,” University of California, Berkeley professor Elisabeth Semel told AFP. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:10 pm
The bare numbers don’t tell much, but they matter anyway. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:31 pm
Jens raises the question whether CIA personnel involved in drone strikes can qualify for combat immunity. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:36 am
Jennings, who was working on a private members bill to address the same issue, says: "The crux of the matter is that the relevant dispositions preventing camcording are found in the Copyright Act. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:00 am
by Jens Ohlin [Jens David Ohlin is an Associate Professor of Law at Cornell Law School; he blogs at LieberCode.] [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:01 pm
In Jennings v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Jennings frustration; the exchange was flat out surreal.I get that Rep. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:02 am
" But, “a few minutes of violence” is not a trivial matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:49 pm
But there is nothing about adding an extra layer of protection against targeting as a matter of domestic law or policy that undermines the theory of IHL/IHRL complementarity. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
This will be our only comment on this private, family matter. [read post]
