Search for: "Matter of Jost"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2008, 4:29 pm
Digest by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
15 May 2007, 3:00 am
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:25 am
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” Kenneth Jost observes at Jost on Justice that “[o]ther federal appellate courts have conducted oral arguments remotely over the past two weeks; the Supreme Court should follow suit and, in the process, recognize the need to give the public greater access to their proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
ROVNER: Timothy Jost is a law professor at Washington and Lee University Law School in Lexington, Virginia. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost observes that “the administration is set to open the Supreme Court’s new term next month … by siding with business interests and against organized labor in a case testing employees’ ability to join with other workers in contesting workplace policies that violate state or federal law,” “after revers[ing] the position previously taken by the Obama administration. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost compares the class action of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:27 pm
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:30 am
AFFIRMED Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:00 am
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
To make matters even worse, my friend Steve Doocy was there (with, of course, that “other Doocy,”Peter). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost considers the prospect that the Court in the Montana campaign finance case could take a “[f]resh [l]ook” at Citizens United. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:46 pm
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
At his Jost on Justice blog, Kenneth Jost looks back what he characterizes as the decline in candor from Supreme Court nominees over time. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost writes that two Supreme Court matters this term, Tharpe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
” Kenneth Jost, at Jost on Justice, suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts may have joined the majority due to an unwillingness “to join his fellow conservatives in curtailing the court’s constitutional supremacy over state courts on matters of federal law. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am
magazine, Fran Korten notes that “[n]o matter how the court rules” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
Digested by Sarah Jost Nielsen, Diana L. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:46 am
Nonetheless, barring legislative revision to the IPAB provisions, it would seem to be only a matter of time before IPAB acts, and only a matter of time before IPAB gets its day in court. [read post]
