Search for: "Matter of K.G. K.G. and K.G."
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
To take my own example, I served as a law clerk under the then CJI K.G. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 6:34 pm
The Hindu describes the proceedings before that bench as under: A two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, dealing with a public interest litigation petition since 2004, has referred the matter to Chief Justice K.G. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
(K.G.), [1993], 1 SCR 740 at 789, the Supreme Court of Canada said: “There remain compelling reasons to prefer statements made under oath, solemn affirmation or solemn declaration. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:36 am
Then I read K.G. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
Under UIFSA Florida retained exclusive jurisdiction over his child support obligation to the daughter, where mother died, and father remained in Florida although daughter moved to New York and under Florida law, his obligation to support the daughter ceased when she turned 18 In Matter of Nassau County Department of Social Services v Ablog, 2021 WL 1899886 (2d Dept.,2021) pursuant to a 2009… [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 8:17 am
K.G. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:57 am
K.G. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
” written by K.G. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
”’ A fourth student, K.G., told Bell Rainey approached her in the gym and said, `damn baby, you are sexy. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
An obiter dictum is not binding in later cases because it was not strictly relevant to the matter in issue in the original case. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Observes Equitable Estoppel Requires Close Scrutiny of Child.In re K.G., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Observes Equitable Estoppel Requires Close Scrutiny of Child.In re K.G., v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
(K.G.), 1993 CanLII 116 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740, [1993] S.C.J. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
The order of disposition was reversed on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the fact-finding order was vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a new fact-finding hearing. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
Justice Carroll dissents, reasoning that these are not matters to determine on summary judgment and that the record needs further development. [read post]
