Search for: "Matter of Klarman" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
Honorable mentions are also awarded, but awards are not presented in every category in every year.The ABA Gavel Awards Screening Committee, composed of 45 lawyer-members of the ABA, selected the 19 finalists from 156 entries received in all eligible categories, which include books, commentary, documentaries, drama and literature, magazines, multimedia, newspapers, radio and television.Selection criteria include how the entry addresses the Gavel Awards’ purpose and objectives; educational… [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So the question is whether we should take the same view of congressional legislation (or decisionmaking by the executive or, for that matter, the judiciary). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Patrick Parsons
Klarman …should be on every American’s bookshelf. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:59 am by Chad M. Oldfather
When it does, I am almost always channeling (what is undoubtedly the poor person’s version of) Mike Klarman, who has served as an important teacher, mentor, and friend. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:15 pm by Amanda Frost
And, like most legal scholars, they believe term limits would require an amendment to the Constitution, and so would be nearly impossible to achieve as a practical matter. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:30 am by margaret
This suggestion has been advanced by Professor Michael Klarman of Harvard Law School, among others. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
But I wonder if a broader discussion of the threats to reproductive and sexual rights could support an expanded strategy.1) Michael Klarman's argument about backlash is a bit right and mostly wrong. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
But I wonder if a broader discussion of the threats to reproductive and sexual rights could support an expanded strategy.1) Michael Klarman's argument about backlash is a bit right and mostly wrong. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We put our faith in Oracles who stand atop politics because we are sickened by the emergence of a world in which facts no longer matter, science is ridiculed, and jack-booted racism is on the march. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 1:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The Court may start acting on those cases in a matter of weeks. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  No one cares about the actual legal issue raised in Marbury—whether Congress can add to the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; it is not relevant to any contemporary litigation, nor, as a matter of fact, does Marbury truly feature as the centerpiece of contemporary articles on constitutional theory, including, for that matter, the propriety of judicial review. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm by Lincoln Caplan
But language, history, and tradition — words and how they are structured; what the words meant when they became law; and how the law has applied the words — also matter to Breyer. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm by Paul Horwitz
 It shouldn't take twenty years of Klarman, Rosenberg, Sunsteinian minimalism, Barry Friedman, etc. to convince progressives that the Supreme Court and other prestige positions aren't where the only action is, or even the most important action. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm by Steve Sanders
Evans – that in a purpose inquiry, history, circumstances, and objective evidence (both direct and inferential) about the enactors’ intent all matter. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:49 am by Erin Miller
I do believe that social science can serve a function in courts, and of course can be helpful in legislative matters. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Michael KlarmanFor the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 (See, for example, Mike Klarman’s 2020 Foreword to the Harvard Law Review). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  This is certainly the theme of recent overviews of the Court written by such scholars as Barry Friedman, Michael Klarman, or Lucas Powe, not to mention Mark Graber’s classic demonstration of the way that the Court has often accepted invitations given it by ostensible majoritarian political parties to decide political hot potatoes whose legislative resolution would simply be too risky. [read post]