Search for: "Matter of Lee v Lee"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Lee. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
The case is Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
“[D]isclosure of matter obtained by discovery is not conclusive but may be contradicted” Trapkus v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Lee. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The investigation will concern the impartiality requirements for programs dealing with matters of major political controversy and major matters relating to current public policy. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:40 am
"] From Manookian v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Lee, 720 F.3d 96, 106 (2d Cir. 2013); see also Charalambous v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am
This is the latest attempt to restore affirmative action as a matter of reparations. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:39 am
One of those cases was Matter of Bourguignon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
We were unable to locate the one cited as "Matter of Bourguignon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Lee and Merriam) upholds the verdict.The case is Csikos v. 230 Park South Apartments, a summary order issued on January 25. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
It's more complicated, and definitions matter a lot, including for intellectual property law. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]