Search for: "Matter of Levy v State of New York"
Results 21 - 40
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
New York is blessed with perhaps the strongest state judiciary in the nation. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:25 am
NEW YORK COUNTYAlternative Dispute ResolutionUnion Granted Right to Arbitrate Grievance; Unified Court System Denied Stay of Arbitration Matter of Unified Court System of the State of New York v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:17 am
Robson BRONX COUNTYContractsProposed Transfer of Structured Settlement Is Deemed Unfair, Not in Individual's Best Interest Matter of Settlement Funding of New York, LLC, (Saxton) v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
From Findlaw Opinion Summaries: April 24, 2008 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE, SECURITIES LAW, TAX LAW In the Matter of Steel Los III/Goya Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
City of New York, respondents
NEW YORK COUNTYTortsDefendants Fail to Establish Entitlement to Judgment Of Whether Agent Made Negligent Misrepresentations Blumenthal-Levy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Levy Ratner, P.C., New York (Patricia McConnell of counsel), for Professional Staff Congress/City University of New York and Peter Zwiebach, respondents. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Levy Ratner, P.C., New York (Patricia McConnell of counsel), for Professional Staff Congress/City University of New York and Peter Zwiebach, respondents. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No.… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No.… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
(NML), one of Argentina’s bondholders, prevailed in 11 debt-collection actions that it brought against Argentina in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
But the more important, and first, Supreme Court reference to the "court of history" is in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
Last week, the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, handed down one of the more intriguing decisions by a New York court I’ve seen in a long time involving a dispute between LLC members. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
This is an issue for the seven states that do not allow online betting: Arkansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Washington. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm
Vyera, and New York v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:12 am
Then the majority begins by deciding that, as a matter of binding Second Circuit law, hot news must be regarded as a currently-viable doctrine under New York law. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Rothschild reacted by moving the NFTs to a different marketplace, Rarible.[15] In January 2022, the French luxury brand officially sued Rothschild for trademark infringement, dilution, and cybersquatting, filing their complaint in a New York federal court. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
But if policymakers wish to reform existing limitation regimes, or to seek alternatives, they must first recognize the circumstances under which they have been adopted and to acknowledge that, irrespective of whether the limitations are desirable as a matter of public policy, their appeal is eminently understandable. [read post]
