Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Bowers"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
For this reason, Kennedy explains, the Court was wrong in Bowers v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Citing Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
” If this empirical claim were clearly right, it would be a matter worth worrying about. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
In fact, outside of reproduction, sexuality and marriage, liberals have not been doing very well in the Supreme Court for a very long time, no matter what they argue. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Bower v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
In fact, Bork indignantly rejected Justice Harry Blackmun’s statement in his Bowers dissent that individual rights are protected because “a person belongs to himself and not others nor to society as a whole. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:22 pm
The Supreme Court of 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court of 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
Texas, in which he defended the state's power to criminalize sodomy: State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers’ validation of laws based on moral choices. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
Constitutional law used to see “no connection” between on one hand the kinds of same-sex sexual activityproscribed by Georgiaand on the other hand “family,” in the words of Bowers v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
Applying Baker, Judge Jones held that the state's motion to dismiss the case should be granted in part, to the extent that the complaint was premised on the argument that same-sex couples have a right to marry as a matter of Equal Protection. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court to decide the matter. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court to decide the matter. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:53 pm
As John Bowers pointed out, any disbenefit or harm on the other side of the balance would have to be a matter of evidence. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:56 am
Texas reversing Bowers. [read post]
