Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2020, 7:01 pm by Gregory Forman
Rogers, whose litigation misbehavior was truly impressive. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Eventually, the matter went to court and the school now admits boys and girls of all races. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Eventually, the matter went to court and the school now admits boys and girls of all races. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:53 am by David Ingram
He held a similar position at a prior firm, Rogers & Wells, which is now part of Clifford Chance. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:35 am
(Roger Scruton made such an argument for difference in his book on the philosophy of sex). [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm by Richard Zorza
  After all, the premise of UPL rules is that a matter is too complex to be handled by non-attorneys. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:47 am by Mike Scarcella
Chief Judge David Sentelle heard the case with judges Judith Rogers and Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by John
This divorce ends Holmes’ first marriage, while it ends Cruise’s third marriage. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by John
This divorce ends Holmes’ first marriage, while it ends Cruise’s third marriage. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 9:54 am by Andrew Delaney
” Moreover, the court found no basis for revisiting that determination, either from Jennifer’s testimony, or anyone else’s for that matter. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sharp (1948) by legal legend Justice Roger Traynor for the California Supreme Court (pp. 44-47). [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:05 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Roger Johnson, as Indiana State Fire Marshall v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 7:06 am by Russell Knight
’ ” In re Marriage of Rogers, 213 Ill. 2d 129, 136-37 (2004)(quoting Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1143 (1986)) That same case determined that gifts from a parent to a divorcing “represented a valuable benefit… that enhanced [the child’s] wealth and facilitated his ability to support” In re Marriage of Rogers, 213 Ill. 2d 129. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
Bowers, 34 FLW 207, trial court erred in discharging the def from further prosecution based on a violation of rule 3.191-continuances and delays attributable to the def waived speedy trial time in rule 3.191(m) even after a mistrial one would have to file a demand.Beam, 34 FLW 217, 5th DCA, def who had sexual intercourse with his 18 year old adopted daughter and niece by his marriage could not be convicted of incest because adopted daughter was not related to the def by consanguinity-does… [read post]