Search for: "Matter of Martial" Results 21 - 40 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2009, 11:28 am
Gamond, a martial arts instructor, picked up the girl in Lakewood, drove her to Seal Beach where he assaulted her, and then released her in Cerritos. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am by Eugene R. Fidell
HOW “ROBUST” IS APPELLATE REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:01 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
It may not matter if the judge does not follow the MJBB when instructing the members. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:16 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
[Update:  The Temple Daily Telegram reports, here, that the hearing addressed a defense request to delay the court-martial until October. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 2:00 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
He also asked a question to the effect of, ‘How does the Chief of Staff of the Army’s current emphasis on sexual harassment affect the findings and our decision in this matter? [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:41 am by Legal Profession Prof
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Judge Walton) granted and denied in part defendant's motion to dismiss and granted and denied in part plaintiff's summary judgment in a civil matter attacking a court martial conviction of... [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
It should go without saying that a court-martial is a most serious matter, and the requirement for proof beyond a reasonable doubt plays a vital role in the legitimacy of the military justice system. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:24 am by thejaghunter
Hennis’ lawyer Frank Spinner said that the defense team may ask the military judge to postpone the court-martial while the civilian judge considers the matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 1:21 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
  The Army has published a supplement to the current MCM which has all of the MRE and some interpretative matters in one easy to find location. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:36 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th dismisses for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Innocence Protection Act (IPA). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
The issue does not address the application of the Freedom of Information Act, a clear collateral matter entrusted to other courts, but a military judge’s application of R.C.M. 806 to a specific court-martial. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
UPDATE:  And how did I miss this, “On March 31, 2010, Army TJAG certified Ali court-martial to Army Court of Criminal Appeals on whether court-martial had jurisdiction under Article 2(a)(10) and whether court-martial had subject-matter jurisdiction over the offenses. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:58 pm
Ali appeared at a court-martial and "pleaded guilty to wrongful appropriation of a knife owned by a U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The older the alleged other acts the worse the case for admission of MRE 404(b) matter in my view. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 8:06 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
This matter is a pro se petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:46 am by thejaghunter
Citizens in all matters regarding government advanced criminal accusations. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:52 pm
The Constitution outlaws courts-martial because courts-martial are not courts (that is, federal courts holding trials under Article III) and moreover deny affected persons the constitutional protection of a jury.In a series of significant Supreme Court cases listed below the High Court constructed a three-part test for attainder that lines up with military precision with published DOD policy.As a matter of published DOD policy the courts-martial system meets the… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:39 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Your military defense counsel will hopefully do their best to represent you anyway, but he or she is not conflict-free, no matter how hard they try. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:59 am by sally
Regina v Twaite [2010] EWCA Crim 2973; [2010] WLR (D) 342 “Majority verdicts at a hearing before a Courts Martial were not, as a matter of principle, on that account alone to be regarded as blemished by unfairness or uncertainty or lack of safety. [read post]