Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
The recent case of Ajamian v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:56 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Bland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
At Wednesday’s argument in Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in McCoy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
The statute of limitations for a legal malpractice claim is three years (see CPLR 214 [6]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
By Ryan McCoy, Alex Simon, and Cary Burke Seyfarth Synopsis: Recently, the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
United States (Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act - Trust Funds) McCoy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:52 am
In a twit yesterday, the holding in Mock v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
McCoy, 156 A.2d 307 (Pa. 1959). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:00 pm
Shannon, 150 Wis. 2d 434, 450-51 (1989) and citing McCoy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:00 pm
Shannon, 150 Wis. 2d 434, 450-51 (1989) and citing McCoy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:42 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but ‘only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543 [2018], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm
At first blush, Lucia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm
Reed and Ryan McCoy Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday morning in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:46 am
That's what this case is about.The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:50 am
This mattered to McNeil because she claimed that, upon her arrest, McCoy chivalrously yelled from the patrol car that the drugs in her purse actually belonged to him. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
MCCOY: I’m sure. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
McCoy, 178 USPQ 434, 435-36, fn.1 (TTAB 1973); P.A.B. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
The parties must have a "mutual understanding" that further representation is needed with respect to the matter underlying the malpractice claim (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 306). [read post]
