Search for: "Matter of O'Connor"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
And there was "something more" sufficient to satisfy Justice O'Connor, according to the Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:10 pm
Taranto points to the concurring opinion by Breyer (joined by O'Connor). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:55 am
Adam Liptak doesn't care for Justice O'Connor's book "Out of Order." [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
O'Connor graduated third out of a class of 102. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:40 am
Sandra Day O’Connor’s newest book “Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court” comes at an important moment the Supreme Court’s history, as the Justice’s weigh in on the matter of gay marriage and the rights of gay spousal benefits. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
Here is Sandra Day O'Connor's take on one of the nominations [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:31 pm
State of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 506, 510, 478 N.Y.S.2d 829, 467 N.E.2d 493; O'Connor v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm
Baures, and the Appellate Division's decision in O'Connor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:09 am
Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor heard this appeal along with Second Circuit Judges Dennis Jacobs and John Walker.If you handle employment cases in New York, you know that, for plaintiffs, the private-employee whistleblower law creates hurdles as large as Mount Everest. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 2:13 pm
To go right because by chance it did.Once again, it's not a story of the system insuring that an innocent man wouldn't spend the rest of his life in prison (or that he wouldn't be executed, for that matter). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:29 am
So the litigant tries to present anti-vegetarian animus as a matter of gender. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Justice Stewart was replaced by Justice O’Connor, who voted with the majority. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and 9th U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
What I'm really looking for in Salazar is the question of whether Justice O'Connor's "Endorsement Test" is still viable or whether a minimum of five justices affirmatively stated that they were abandoning that approach adopted by a majority of the Supreme Court in Doe v. [read post]
