Search for: "Matter of Pierce v State of New York"
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 4:49 am
The decision devotes but a single sentence to its rationale for relieving the two shareholders of liability: The Supreme Court also should not have found liability on the part of Tehseldar and Tartir, who were corporate principals of the corporate defendants, because one of the primary legitimate purposes of incorporating is to limit or eliminate the personal liability of corporate principals (see Bartle v Home Owners Coop., 309 NY 103, 106), and the court did not find that they… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Courthouse News Services, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Pierce (Ark., No. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
New York Times v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:30 am
Anwar v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 4:41 am
In October 2020, I blogged about a pre-answer dismissal decision in Pachter v Winiarsky, in which a New York court for the first time upheld a claim for common-law LLC dissolution, even where the court in the same decision held that the petition failed to state a claim for statutory dissolution under Section 702 of the Limited Liability Company Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
” Pierce v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
In this interesting treatment of the issue of compelling a non-party to arbitrate, In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Sunskar LTD. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
New York New York University, 2006. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
Offered the choice of relocating to New York within 30 days, applying for short-term disability leave, or accepting termination, the employee explained she could not move to New York because of her medical restrictions. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
She claimed to have a common-law marriage, a concept not recognized in New York State. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
The New York Court of Appeals has explained, most recently in Messenger v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
" * State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
Prior to New York’s adoption in the late 1970′s of a statutory remedy for minority shareholder oppression under § 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law, a minority shareholder alleging squeeze-out or other coercive conduct by controlling shareholders was limited to a common-law claim for dissolution which, as somewhat amorphously articulated by New York’s highest court in Leibert v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 8:07 pm
Police Use of Sound Cannons Questioned", New York Times 1 June 2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:34 pm
Walder, New York Law JournalSex Offender Issues, Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
For those who follow judicial trends, it may also be worthwhile to look at the case decided by the Supreme Court one day earlier in New York State Rifle Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
