Search for: "Matter of Reinstatement of Rule 37"
Results 21 - 40
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
§ 325E.37, subd. 1(d). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
The Second District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles has ruled that banks are “legally bound by their loan modification promises,” and can be sued for fraud when homeowners rely on such promises and are damaged as a result. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
See Brief for Petitioners at 37-38; Brief for the Chamber of Commerce at 22. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
That's because almost all the petitions discussed in this post are petitions under 37 C.R.F. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
In both instances, the district court ruled that an injunction was not “just and proper,” primarily because the employer had already offered, or would soon offer, reinstatement to the discharged employees. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:04 am
As to this determination by PERB the court annulled PERB’s decision and reinstated PERB’s Administrative Law Judge’s ruling on this point [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
The trial court would later determine whether, as a legal matter, the code actually was copyrightable – the thinking was that this sequence would avoid a retrial if the judge found the code was not copyrightable and an appeals court reversed; the appeals court could then simply reinstate the jury’s verdict. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
After the Supreme Court in 1976 allowed states to reinstate the death penalty, 37 states had laws on the books permitting the use of capital punishment, and nearly all of those states have executed a prisoner. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
Id. at 37. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which ruled in Cabral v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
Green of Lerach Coughlin entitled "The Unfair Competition Law After Proposition 64: The Supreme Court Speaks," 15 Competition 37 (2006). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
Hibbs insisted it was legal but Judge Staudt said as a practical matter "they won't do it." [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
The Appellate Division, in considering the matter, noted that it had recently ruled in a case "wherein the offending employee executed a disciplinary settlement agreement that imposed a one-year ‘disciplinary evaluation period,' which the parties, in turn, understood to be the equivalent of a probationary period," [Matter of Campbell, 37 AD3d 993]. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 11:05 am
The original pre-conditions for the OLRB to certify a union as a remedy for employer misconduct are reinstated: remedial certification is only available if no other remedy would be sufficient to counter the effects of the employer’s contravention First Collective Agreement Mediation In addition to arbitration, first collective agreement mediation is available. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:55 am
The rules Gaudio was alleged to have violated were: 37 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:53 am
Third, the Court ruled that the learned intermediary doctrine was not in any way outdated. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
This means that the employer not only has paid the less senior individual that it retained in the position in violation of the “seniority in layoff rules,” it typically must also reinstate the more senior individual to his or her former position with back salary and benefits. [read post]
