Search for: "Matter of Ripa v Ripa"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
Sensitivity of content and metadataWhy does the distinction between content and metadata matter? [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
Sensitivity of content and metadataWhy does the distinction between content and metadata matter? [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
It has been criticised almost from birth:"We have found RIPA to be a particularly puzzling statute" (R v W, Court of Appeal, 2003)"longer and even more perplexing" than the "short but difficult" Interception of Communications Act 1985. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
The Washington Post discusses the matter here. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm
On the issue of RIPA and journalists’s sources, the Interception of Communications Commissioner (‘IOCCO’) today issued its timely recommendations on the matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
The Metropolitan Police allegedly misled the Press Gazette over the extent to which it used RIPA to spy on journalists during its Operation Alice investigation. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
Suspicion is a highly subjective matter.History suggests that general collection and subject matter analysis was an established approach to external communications long before today’s separation problems arose.The ancestor of RIPA Section 8(4) was Section 4 of the Official Secrets Act 1920, legislated in the immediate aftermath of the First World War following the lapsing of wartime powers. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
The ECHR is binding on the UK as a matter of international law, though UK courts are not permitted to disapply or strike down statutes that are incompatible with it. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Kathi Kalu Oghad reconsidered the matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
The committee also identified a “serious omission” in the paper – the impact of its proposals on the freedom of the media to report on matters of public interest and concern. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am
Today during the Home Affairs Select Committee session with Deputy Commissioner John Yates this matter was raised again. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
However, as matters turned out, it was not necessary to resolve in the proceedings whether section 1(1) of RIPA required proof that the interceptions had taken place before the intended recipients had listened to the messages. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
(See Bond v. [read post]
