Search for: "Matter of Rodriquez"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 9:54 am
Rodriquez, Houston, TX: Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
Before discussing whether reasonable suspicion existed, the court recognized that Rodriquez overturned prior rulings of lower appellate courts, including North Carolina’s (see State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
Before discussing whether reasonable suspicion existed, the court recognized that Rodriquez overturned prior rulings of lower appellate courts, including North Carolina’s (see State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
But here there is, and experience matters. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:11 pm
As for the public policy argument, the court held that any duty of care as a matter of public policy fails. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:11 pm
As for the public policy argument, the court held that any duty of care as a matter of public policy fails. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:11 pm
As for the public policy argument, the court held that any duty of care as a matter of public policy fails. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:11 pm
As for the public policy argument, the court held that any duty of care as a matter of public policy fails. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In addition, Advisen uses a counting methodology that differs from that used by other reporting sources, which count each action as a single suit no matter how many complaints are filed and no matter how many defendants are named. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:01 am
The appalling lynch mob reporting by the Buffalo News up to now was one of the reasons I became as involved in this matter as I did in the first place. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
This did not matter, because someone else did all of this for him. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
This is unfortunate because had such a policy been in place this matter may have been avoided. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Other courts have reached a different conclusion on the prejudgment interest question,1 but if Rodriquez and M&F stand up, what it means as a practical matter is that prejudgment interest is discretionary, but not mandatory, in UCL actions. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:43 pm
Plaintiff moved to remand the case to state court, arguing that defendant could not establish subject-matter jurisdiction because the total amount in controversy did not exceed $5 million. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:21 am
Rodriquez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
Rodriquez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Note: just before the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, in McReynolds, the 5th Circuit issued its decision in Rodriquez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:02 pm
Rodriquez, 68 AD3d 676 (1st Dept 2009). [read post]
