Search for: "Matter of Rosenberg v Rosenberg"
Results 21 - 40
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
"While it is true that the recommendations of court-appointed experts are but one factor to be considered in making any custody determination and are not determinative . . . such recommendations are entitled to some weight . . . unless such opinions are contradicted by the record" (Young v Young, 212 AD2d at 118 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 44 AD3d 1022, 1024-1025 [2007]; Matter of Kozlowski… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 5:30 am
To answer that question, David turns to Stone v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
**Generally, a statement is subject to a qualified privilege when “it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his own affairs, in a matter where his interest is concerned. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
That was the question at issue in R. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Recently, the Fourth District addressed this issue as a matter of first impression in Bolger v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
Yale student Gabe Rosenberg wrote the following summary of yesterday’s decision in Florida Department of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:57 pm
I've long followed and much admired CIR's work; Rosenberger v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 8:49 am
After all, Stone v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
Peter Rosenberg, New York City, for plaintiff. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:55 pm
Rosenberg, 400 N.J. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
Links & Updates Here is a link to Justice Himel’s decision in Bedford v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
In Rosenberg v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:21 am
In the case of Scott v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
Judge Hellerstein asks Rosenberg to focus on the specific bases for exclusion under Rule 14a-8. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
" Rosenberg Estate v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:21 pm
So why does this matter? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:33 am
The trial court should apply the factors set forth in R.P.C. 1.5(a), in accordance with Rosenberg v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
” Rosenberg v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
In a bad faith decision which was handed down back around the beginning of 2013 in the case of Dolph v. [read post]
