Search for: "Matter of Ryan v. Supreme Court of the State of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Caetano’s petition and our amicus brief argued that there was a split between the reasoning of this decision and the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
That is syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Saleh Al-Batati report that “[a] disabled Yemeni girl, whose exclusion from the U.S. was questioned by Supreme Court justices reviewing the Trump administration’s travel ban, arrived Saturday in New York for resettlement. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
McDonald, a lawsuit seeking to bar New York and New York City from considering race or ethnicity in connection with the allocation of COVID-19 treatments. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am by Ryan Scoville
This would mean that Virginia, New Jersey, and New York could require the use of the name “East Sea” in their public school textbooks if doing so falls within the “traditional competence” of state governments. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Ryan, 806 P.2d 935, 941 (Colo. 1991) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute, when limited to speech on matters of purely private concern). [3] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
  There have also been some significant new court decisions out of the United States Supreme Court favoring enforceability of these agreements. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals opined in Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] "expresses this State's strong commitment to open government and public accountability and imposes a broad standard of disclosure upon the State and its agencies. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
In the New York University Journal of Law and Liberty, Ryan Scoville suggests that the Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the summary affirmance in Covington, noting that “the question in the case was similar to one the justices addressed last month, in which “the court struck down two of the state’s congressional districts as racial gerrymanders. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Shane Harris guest-hosted the Lawfare Podcast and interviewed Ben about Lawfare’s history and its transition its new online home: Probably to give us a chance to show off the new site's features, the Supreme Court chose Monday to release its decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
New York – Ethics Panel Investigating de Blasio’s Nonprofit Is Said to Issue Broad Subpoena New York Times – William Rashbaum | Published: 10/5/2016 A state ethics panel investigating New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s political nonprofit organization has served a sweeping subpoena on City Hall seeking communications among the mayor, his aides, the nonprofit, its donors, and consulting firms that worked for… [read post]