Search for: "Matter of Sanchez v Sanchez"
Results 21 - 40
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
This morning Advocate General (AG) Campos Sanchez-Bordona addressed this very question by delivering his Opinion in United Video Properties, Inc v Telenet NV, C-57/15, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal of Antwerp (Belgium) seeking clarification as to the correct interpretation of Article 14 of the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
In Huete v Sanchez, 2019 WL 4198658 (E.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In Sanchez v The Department of Education of the City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00954, the Appellate Division held that Sanchez, the petitioner in this CPLR Article 78 action, was not entitled to the restoration of his tenure upon his return from resignation as he failed to provide 30 days' notice of his resignation. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In Sanchez v The Department of Education of the City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00954, the Appellate Division held that Sanchez, the petitioner in this CPLR Article 78 action, was not entitled to the restoration of his tenure upon his return from resignation as he failed to provide 30 days' notice of his resignation. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:25 am
Here are the briefs and order in the matter of Sanchez et al v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 2:35 pm
Straight up.Does it matter that Adult's a woman, and so is Kid? [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
In Vite-Cruz v Sanchez, 2018 WL 6680514 (D. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:57 pm
On March 17, the Second District Court of Appeal issued another strong decision for employees in Sanchez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
Brennan (10th Cir., February 14, 2017) (affirming dismissal of complaint for lack of jurisdiction because Sanchez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies) Miscellaneous *BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 11:22 am
Two, the matter that is appealed must be collateral to the merits. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:14 am
ShareSanchez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:13 am
As a temporal matter, we're asking what you would have done then, not what you'd do now.Now, Judge Thompson doesn't hold that post-sentencing events are always irrelevant, only that they're not relevant to the first prong of the Ameline inquiry: whether or not the judge would have given the same sentence. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
But here's the wrinkle: that's because (for complicated reasons) there was no election in 2020.Justice Sanchez says that doesn't matter. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
See Sanchez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 7:27 am
Comcast Corporation et al, 2-16-cv-06516 (PAED May 7, 2018, Order) (Sanchez, USDJ) [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:53 am
Ultimately, Sanchez-Medina was found guilty and appealed the matter. [read post]
20 May 2007, 6:36 pm
Los Cucos Mexican Cafe v. [read post]
