Search for: "Matter of Smith v Barney" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:50 am by Marie Louise
(EFF) US: Inter-agency group takes on counterfeit pharmaceuticals (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Recent Hatch-Waxman scholarship suggests patent settlement and product hopping create a ‘lethal combination’; another article proposes a ‘Smith Barney approach’ to 180-day exclusivity (FDA Law Blog) US: Sen Harkin urges FDA to avoid delays of generic drug approvals (GenericsWeb) Products Actos (Pioglitazone) – US: Takeda files patent infringement complaint against… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court also reversed the Court of Appeals May 18, 2010 decision in the matter of White v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"In an action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff must prove a misrepresentation or a material omission of fact which was false and known to be false by [the] defendant, made for the purpose of inducing the other party to rely upon it, justifiable reliance of the other party on the misrepresentation or material omission, and injury" (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
(NFP).She has also held positions with Salomon Smith Barney and CIBC World Markets(formerly Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.). [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
(Let's deny the right to litigate and to appeal when it really matters)Higgings v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
The rights asserted by Smith Barney in this case are based simply on an interpretation of the contract to arbitrate, as opposed to the actual merits of the underlying substantive claims. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:32 pm
The rights asserted by Smith Barney in this case are based simply on an interpretation of the contract to arbitrate, as opposed to the actual merits of the underlying substantive claims. [read post]