Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Randy M."
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Rules from Bruen Further analysis of the material in this Part is in my article Restoring the right to bear arms: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Marc Stephens is very, very concerned that in my first post I linked to public documents from the California Secretary of State regarding “MAS Acquisitions, Inc.” (I didn’t post similar documents from New York.) [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
That fall, I went to New York and met with her and Karp. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Finally, here is a seminal law review article by Randy Barnett – whom the New York Times called the “intellectual godfather” of these lawsuits – that shows why the federal requirement that everybody enter the marketplace and buy a particular product is unprecedented and unconstitutional. 2. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
In 2016, she gave an interview with Adam Liptak of the New York Times. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s one story from The New York Times, with links to quite a few more. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Jeffrey M. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Jeffrey M. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
