Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 21 - 40
of 19,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
(I still haven't read Rahimi; I have been putting it off for as long as I can.) [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
By tradition, they do not do so, although the decision is a matter for each individual. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 3:26 am
(b) he paid money for a scoop. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 pm
Or, to return to the beginning, B+. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:24 pm
I didn’t say this would be easy. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
§5845(b); see also 18 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:00 pm
Dissent: It's not clear that all discrimination against transgender people is sex discrimination, but it doesn't really matter because, yeah, it fails rational-basis scrutiny. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:12 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:09 am
“The only allegation that’s different is they weren’t currently enrolled as a student or weren’t employed by the university,” said public defender Matthew Daloisio, who is representing 43 defen [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
During the trial, defendant’s ankles were shackled. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm
On or about June 20, 2023, CC-1 sent Gupta a news article about the victim and messaged Gupta, "[i]t's [a] priority now. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:25 am
They do matter! [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
This clause provided that a given event or state of affairs, in order to constitute a “Force Majeure Event”, had to be such that “[i]t cannot be overcome by reasonable endeavors from the Party affected”.[2]On 6 April 2018, RTI’s parent, and thus by extension RTI as well, became subject to US sanctions. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:08 am
txtType=PDF&sessYr=2023&sessInd=0&billBody=S&billTyp=B&billNbr=0055&pn=1169 [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
What confounds me, however, is Part III-B of Justice Barrett's Vidal concurrence. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
And perception is reality in legal systems: if the public doesn't accept the legitimacy of a particular kind of judging, that may be reason enough to reject such judging, even if we think the public's views aren't rational. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:34 am
Georgia’s Rule is slightly broader and prohibits lawyers (whether or not they represent a client in the matter) from communicating ex parte with a judge, juror, prospective juror, or other official, unless permitted by law. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:36 pm
G.S. 132-1.4A(b). [read post]
