Search for: "Matter of Tos"
Results 21 - 40
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 8:59 pm
I can't recall if the friends were also what lawyers call coconspirators (it means "conspirators"), but it doesn't matter. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:52 pm
To many observers, the slide toward the Rule of TOS feels inevitable. 4. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
Eric Goldman has written (and testified in Congress) about why TOS provisions assigning copyright in future-authored consumer feedback are a terrible idea, and why they should be banned as a matter of public policy. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
Like me, JZ seems to agree that the significance of the actual change to the TOS here was relatively minor, and he argues that such storms are “good times to think about these matters â€â [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm
The government issued various task orders (TOs) under the overarching IDIQ, and disputes arose between T.H.R. and the government under three of these orders: TOs 22, 25, and 26. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:50 pm
Section 14 of the TOS covers exactly that. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:02 am
In one example, a reverend couldn’t initially promote a Black Lives Matter-themed concert on Facebook, eventually discovering that using the words “Black Lives Matter” required additional review. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
The work site is not the place for open-toed shoes or sleeveless tops, no matter how trendy they might be. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:15 am
Enforcing website terms of service is generally a matter of contract law. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:56 pm
In an article in today's New York Times, Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg seemed apologetic, but does not say the matter is closed. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
You'll no doubt enjoy it because of its mix of interesting topics and genuinely useful knowledge, including brutally honest product reviews and informative how-tos. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
This is overbroad for two related reasons: First, “exceeding authorized access” might mean anything, including violating TOS; and second, the statute applies to obtaining any kind of information, not just sensitive information, so it would include any kind of TOS violations, no matter how arbitrary or silly. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:48 am
So she's decided to take matters into her own hands. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:23 pm
However, having helped with abuse-related matters, I know well that it can descend into a rather childish game where people complain about petty things outside the scope of the TOS. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:00 am
You'll no doubt enjoy it because of its mix of interesting topics and genuinely useful knowledge, including brutally honest product reviews and informative how-tos. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:00 pm
In a perfect world, a registrar should be able to remain neutral in these situations regardless of public opinion but the fact of the matter is that this cannot happen in reality. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
You'll no doubt enjoy it because of its mix of interesting topics and genuinely useful knowledge, including brutally honest product reviews and informative how-tos. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
As a practical matter, though, SDOC filtering requirements would probably be bad news for fundamental rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:01 am
And that was the case here: Here, because Plaintiff did not assent to the Terms of Use, they simply do not bind her as a matter of contract law. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 2:49 am
There was some toing and froing on the decision. [read post]
