Search for: "Matter of Will of Padilla"
Results 21 - 40
of 366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2007, 2:18 am
The Padilla trial should be watched in classrooms and studied. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
While a positive case for those in the pro-Padilla camp, it is important to point out that the matter came to the Bonilla court on a motion to withdraw a plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 (d)(2)(B). [read post]
29 Dec 2005, 10:54 am
[JURIST] Less than two weeks after arguing in a brief that the US Supreme Court should stay out of the Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive] "enemy combatant" case because criminal charges against Padilla [JURIST report] in late November rendered his appeal moot, the US Department of Justice Wednesday asked the Court to intervene in matter of his custody, claiming that the US Fourth Circuit Court of [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm
The panel held that Kavanaugh’s lay opinion testimony (on matters such as what certain code phrases meant) was rationally based on his own perceptions, and that it was no abuse of discretion to admit it. 2. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Background Jose Padilla’s story is by now well-known. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
It matters not what the prevailing norms were in the Eighth Circuit at the time of the conduct at issue in Perez. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Inevitably, the threat of potential judicial examination of these matters, and particularly the threat of personal liability, would affect all future executive deliberations. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:37 am
United States matter can be found at the SCOTUSblog. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:10 am
Padilla v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
It leaves open the possibility to challenge “material representations” where the client is affirmatively misled with the wrong advice regarding deportation or another collateral matter. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 12:11 pm
Padilla has not made such a showing, and his motion should be denied as a matter of law.Well of course there are no cases involving misconduct during prior military incarceration -- that was part of the misconduct! [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
It takes little enough imagination to understand that a judicially devised damages action would expose past executive deliberations affecting sensitive matters of national security to the prospect of searching judicial scrutiny. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 5:11 pm
Would that matter here?) [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The fear among many jurists is that if Padilla is held to be retroactive in post-conviction matters, the floodgates would be opened, and many pre-Padilla pleas would come back before the courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Which is not to say that there are no Padilla-style motions gestating in the courts, and it is only a matter of time until the courts begin opining upon the reach of Padilla. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:56 am
Padilla's competency could freeze many matters. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
Also of note is that lawyers from the National Immigrant Justice Center have entered appearances on behalf of defendant in the Chaidez matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:29 pm
And it is of more than a little concern when an agency like BIS which is required to be conversant in technical matters doesn’t fully understand what it is regulating. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
" "Appears convinced at times that no matter what happens he will be returned to the brig, even if he prevails in the current case.'' Was certain that nobody could help him, that he could not be rescued from his current situation.'' Both experts concluded that Padilla was not faking mental problems and, in Hegarty's words, "is terrified that anyone will consider him mentally ill or crazy.'' [read post]
