Search for: "Matter of the Adoption of BGH"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 4:20 am
Accordingly, in the opinion of the authors, for future German jurisdiction much will depend on whether the BGH adapts its previous case law to that of the CJEU. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:16 pm
According to the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof - BGH), the answer is NO – IPKat Eleonora Rosati brings a timely and clear (as always) summary of the very recent judgment I ZR 11/16 - Preview III.Life as an IP Lawyer: Washington, D.C.How is an IP Lawyer's Life in DC! [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
The case went to the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), which held that sampling the "tiniest sliver" ("kleinste Tonfetzen") of a record infringed the record producer's right. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
In its decision of 21 January 2010, the German Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) dealt with both aspects of Art. 34 (2) Brussels I. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
The German BGH and the Austrian OGH took fairly different approaches, the former granting immunity to Greece because of the haircut, the latter proceeding towards examining the heads of international jurisdiction under the Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
The special provisions for proceedings in adoption matters do not apply in recognition proceedings, which has consequences for the remedies a [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the petitioners made a very desperate move and pointed out that the Boards of appeal were not entitled to revoke granted patents. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 12:47 pm
Harmonization of Swiss law with EU law did not compel adopting the ECJ’s case law of Medeva by Swiss courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
The German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) applies this ratio decidendi in a similar case. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:53 pm
The settlement didn’t end the matter. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
Hence, the dualist regime in matters of arbitration was preserved. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:37 pm
In 2008, the EU legislator adopted the Maintenance Regulation. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
, no matter how desirable it may be. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:01 pm
This is evidence (Beweisanzeichen) for [the existence of an] inventive step (see Pagenberg, A 56, marginal number 107, EPÜ Münchner Gemeinschaftskommentar, as well as BGH GRUR 1979, 619, 620 “Tabelliermappe”). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:09 am
Furthermore, if one applies the Brussels I Regulation, has the claim to be qualified as a matter relating to a contract pursuant to Art. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
While this latter criterion may have appeared to simply refer to the place of the causal event of Art 7(2) Brussels Ia in light of the Court of Justice’s decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany, [34] (an interpretation recently adopted by the German Federal Court (BGH 9 Nov 2017 – I ZR 164/16)), the Court of Justice had never specified its interpretation in cases of online infringements. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Still Eleonora reports on the adoption of the DSM directive by the European Parliament. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:40 am
In the meantime the German BGH has abandoned its former case law. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
In the meantime the German BGH has abandoned its former case law. [read post]
