Search for: "Matters v. City of Ames"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
. , Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Aaron Friedberg and Commissioner Jonathan Stivers 9:30 AM – 9:40 AM: Co-Chairs' Opening Remarks 9:40 AM – 11:10 AM: Panel I: Energy, Investment, and Economic Interests Erica Downs, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia SIPA [Testimony]Mohammed Soliman, Director of the Strategic Technologies and Cyber Security Program, Middle East Institute [Testimony]Karen Young, Senior… [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Italian Sons & Daughters of America v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
After all, saying that you have an investment strategy or business plan that incorporates ESG considerations is pretty easy; creating one and sticking to it is another matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
New York City, 438 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:57 am
The problem here is that Freed silenced Lindke on his private Facebook page that also addresses public matters. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
From Justice Barrett's unanimous opinion this morning in Lindke v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1311 (my 4/10/13 post on which can be found here); Lucas v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:35 am
“The instant action arises out of an underlying personal injury matter entitled Palaguachi v The Battery Park City Authority, New York County,index No. 157779/2015, in which defendants were retained by WFP Tower B, L.P. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
Kyle v Coventry City Council (2023) EWCA Civ 1360 Yes, I am very late with this one. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
Some subsequent opinions, such as that in City of Arlington v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Courts are rightfully loath to let the government regulate the rough and tumble of speech surrounding elections as a general matter, preferring counterspeech as the appropriate remedy. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 99 NY2d 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 99 NY2d 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court had just decided Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation (Amy Gutmann ed., 2018). [read post]
