Search for: "Maxwell v. Maxwell" Results 21 - 40 of 726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 5:14 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Near the end of the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Matrix Law
Ms Wang also signed a “services agreement” with a company called Maxwell Holdings Ltd (“Holdings”). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
In Congress and in statehouses throughout the United States, lawmakers continue to introduce legislation designed to bar citizens of foreign adversaries from being able to purchase real property. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
My law practice lives and breathes the science of foodborne illness epidemiology. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The first issue includes: Exploring the (Dormant) Indian Commerce Clause by Maxwell Steinberg Original Meaning and Legislative Intent in McGirt v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction  It used to be the case that an endless investigation of the difference between holding and dictum was a central preoccupation of the first year of law school. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
This weighty tome from Sweet & Maxwell is edited by Richard Davis, Thomas St Quintin and Guy Tritton from Hogarth Chambers, London. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Thomson Reuters, in its UK guise of Sweet and Maxwell, is of much the same character as Lexis Nexis, but it continues deservedly to boast the quality and reputation of its own British Shipping Law series, on which the Lloyd’s library may have been modelled. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:58 am by Jonathan Bailey
” 3: In Japan, Music Schools Don’t Need to Pay Copyright Fees for Students to Learn Music, the Supreme Court Rules Finally today, Clément Vérité at Newsendip reports that the Supreme Court of Japan has ruled that music schools do not need to pay copyright fees for music played by students as part of their education process. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am by INFORRM
Accredited journalists in attendance at financial remedy hearings held in private are collaterally bound by that undertaking: Appleton v Gallagher, above, at [10]. [read post]