Search for: "May v. County of Monterey"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
Stop Syar Expansion v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Cook County, Illinois, 20-450, involve the Trump administration’s “public charge rule. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
(Monterey Coastkeeper v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:49 pm
County of Monterey (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 257 The Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District affirmed a trial court judgment that rejected constitutional claims, including a regulatory takings challenge, against a Monterey County ordinance that provided that no one may keep more than four roosters on a single property without a rooster keeping operation permit. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:34 pm
On the other side, amici curiae applicants proposing briefs in support of the position of plaintiffs/appellants include the California Water Impact Network, California Wildlife Foundation, Landwater Monterey County, and North Coast River Alliance. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
Mendocino County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 564 and McAllister v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
County of Monterey (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 253. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:54 pm
One perhaps more appropriate for April Fool's Day than today, yet, here it is.(1) The County of Monterey says that you can't keep more than 4 roosters on your property, unless you have more than 200 roosters. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
Kicking off the year’s conferences, RPLG attended the League of California Cities (LOCC or League) City Attorneys’ Spring Conference in May. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
” (Quoting Lyon v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is: County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 677, 697.) [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
County of Monterey (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 883, upheld the propriety of an interlocutory remand in CEQA/land use writ litigation to allow a County’s Board to clarify its findings relating to the non-CEQA, general plan consistency issue, while applying a deferential standard of review and holding that “general plan consistency is not an issue reviewed under CEQA. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
In the first, Williams v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm
County of Sonoma, Court of Appeal Case No. [read post]
