Search for: "Mays v. City of LA" Results 21 - 40 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm by Howard Friedman
In Roy v City of Monroe, (WD LA, Oct. 19, 2017), a Louisiana federal district court allowed plaintiff Clarence Roy to move ahead with an "as applied" First Amendment challenge to Monroe, Louisiana's disturbing-the-peace ordinance. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am by Anthony De Yurre
City of Miami Code Section 23-4 (c) (7) provides that “any aggrieved party” may appeal decisions of the Board to the City Commission. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Michael DelSignore
In the present case, the hotel's attorneys mounted a powerful defense in opposition to the City's appeal, which may ultimately benefit criminal defendants both in LA as well in Massachusetts, among others. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:53 am
Las Vegas was the only city to post a month-to-month decline in May, with prices shedding 0.5 percent. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Rapid Transit District (1990) 52 Cal.3d 266, 274–275; City of Santa Clara v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Ya el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico (TSPR) expidió un recurso en Pueblo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
Yet more examples were used to illustrate the point: Vestron v HBO on the futility of injunctions in some cases; Sony v Universal City Studios (the Betamax case) on the contention that disasters predicted by plaintiffs seldom turn out as bad as is first claimed - in that case the home theatre market proved to be a goldmine for the creative industry, not its nemesis. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Patricia Salkin
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v Myers, 145 So. 3d 320 (LA 7/1/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.lasc.org/opinions/2014/13CA2011cw13CD2036.opn.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Family, Standing [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Patricia Salkin
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v Myers, 145 So. 3d 320 (LA 7/1/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.lasc.org/opinions/2014/13CA2011cw13CD2036.opn.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Family, Standing [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
City of Claremont v Kruse (2009) 177 CA4th 1153, 100 CR3d 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The High Court handed down judgment on Friday in Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2020] EWHC 2103 (Fam), the first recorded judgment concerning journalistic access to the court file in public law family proceedings. [read post]