Search for: "McCann v State" Results 21 - 40 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am by J
Now, as you’ll all know, there is a line of European Cases, starting with McCann v UK, taking in Zehentner v Austria and meandering through a range of Croatian cases (Blecic, Orlic, Cosic, etc – see generally, here), which have stated that: the loss of one’s home is a most extreme form of interference with the right to respect for the home. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Giancristoforo; and David McCann (“Petitioners”) took their grievances with the ongoing expansion project at Philadelphia International Airport (“PHL”) to the 3rd Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The prospect of being labelled a ‘criminal’ by the State can frequently be as great a source of consternation as the punishment itself. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 16 March 2010 and is the second part of a post in which Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann discuss the law and practice of harassment as applied to the media. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In McCann v UK, which preceded Cosic, the ECtHR not surprisingly found that the rule in Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk similarly breached Article 8 because of the lack of procedural safeguards (see especially paras [53]-[54]). [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
It is generally accepted that the more a decision lies in the “macro-political” field the less intrusive will be the court’s supervision (R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p. [read post]