Search for: "McCarthy v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Allen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Postal Service notified 46 states and the District of Columbia that their mail-in voting deadlines were incompatible with the Postal Service’s standards for mail processing times. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Trevor McFadden issued a stay early this year in a case the House Ways and Means Committee brought in July 2019 that sought to force the Treasury Department to hand over years of Trump’s individual and business federal tax returns. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am by Margaret Taylor
District Court for the District of Columbia by President Trump and six of his companies against House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings and Trump’s longtime accounting firm Mazars USA LLP. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
Libel Decisions from Other Jurisdictions In Best v Weatherall 2010 BCCA 202 the British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the claimant’s appeal in a libel action concerning a defamatory email and awarded damages of Can$3,000 (£2,000). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am by Chris Castle
  Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Tanner Larkin, Andrew Nell
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unequivocally held that the Jan. 6 committee has a valid legislative purpose and not an improper law enforcement purpose—a holding the Supreme Court chose not to disturb in a recent order. [read post]