Search for: "McFarlane v. McFarlane"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 9:59 pm
Prometheus and AMP v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
McFarlane didn’t mention inaccurate media reporting but partial media reporting. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) – Read judgment or our previous post Case comment Lord Carey of Clifton, responding to Lord Justice Laws’ observations in MacFarlane, has called this latest dust-up about religion in the courts a “deeply unedifying clash of rights“. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
See Sibron v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:37 pm
US v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:08 am
Dufosse v Melbury Events Ltd CA (Civ Div) (Rix LJ, McFarlane LJ, Sir Mark Potter) December 14, 2011 (extemporare judgment) Christmas is full of hazards for the unwary and nowhere is more dangerous it seems than Santa’s grotto, even where there is no sign of a freeze and the only icicles are plastic ones… Poor Santa. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Bonino and Fiona McFarlane. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Bonino and Fiona McFarlane. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:19 am
People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm
In a sense, McFarlane’s message is simple. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:56 am
Brian Corderyby Sarah McFarlane As an early Christmas gift, on 18 December 2019, His Honour Judge Hacon handed down a judgment in the matter of Adolf Nissen Elektrobau v Horizont Group. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:50 am
Many feel that what Sir James Munby gave, Sir Andrew McFarlane has taken away. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:11 pm
McFarlane v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A Message [pdf] published this week by the Lord Burnett of Maldon CJ, Sir Terence Etherton MR and Sir Andrew McFarlane P, outlines how the Circuit and District Judges sitting in Civil and Family should deal with remote working. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The inquiry is always in two stages, namely computation and distribution;”iv) The House of Lords in White v White [2001] AC 596 and Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 has given guidance as to the approach and principles to be applied in the exercise of the statutory discretion conferred by the MCA 1973.v) That guidance makes it clear that the court is to have regard to, and apply, the relevant statutory provisions.vi)… [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:14 am
The recent judgments of the House of Lords in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186 point to the urgent need for the courts to set aside the preposterous contention that it is 'substantially uncontestable' that substantial harm to the public would arise if prenuptial agreements were enforceable. [read post]
