Search for: "Means v. Coy" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Much has been written over the past weeks about the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Uber v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Following other unsuccessful attempts, such as in Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé, 2019 QCCA 358. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:01 am by Patricia Hughes
She explains that the appeal is concerned with the meaning of “religion” in this context and, relying on Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
In November 2008, the Liberals and the NDP agreed to form an executive coaltion (to share cabinet positions), with a promise by the Bloc Québécois not to move non-confidence for 18 months, if the Conservatives lost an expected non-confidence vote (non-confidence in the Prime Minister’s economic plan). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
And a consular official’s denial of a visa based on national security inadmissibility grounds was the subject of a 2015 decision cited approvingly by the majority: Kerry v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Was he merely being coy, or will he finally decide that enough is enough? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
Studies in the UK (several), Australia (2), South Korea, and Portugal have all found website blocking to be an effective means of reducing piracy. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The relevant question is what the people will decide through democratic means. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:00 pm by Pnina Sharvit Baruch
This means that Hamas’ modus operandi of conducting its operations from within or near densely populated areas appears only after the detailed analysis of the Israeli attacks on populated areas, which led to civilian casualties and destruction. [read post]