Search for: "Means v. Parker*"
Results 21 - 40
of 797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023): Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Just as the Federal Reserve credits Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour for boosting the tourism industry and the overall economy, Swift and Beyoncé’s Renaissance World Tour have been a means for lawmakers to boost their own campaign coffers. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
“Nursing CE Central” is a descriptive mark with “a weak secondary meaning….the plaintiff makes no meaningful showing that the public, or even those in the market in which it competes, readily recognizes its name. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
Then it falls back on means-ends scrutiny, but that was emphatically rejected by Bruen. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
The case seeks redress in the means of requiring the manufacturers of these chemicals to conduct robust comprehensive human testing to determine whether continued exposure is deemed safe. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
While the new rule does not officially go into effect until August 4, 2023, the termination of this requirement means that health care workers in these settings are no longer required to be vaccinated against COVID-19. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
From Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
R.A.V. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:38 pm
C.N. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Tyler v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Let me first sketch out what I think Guido means. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
However, note that Nicolet Law, a surname, isn’t registered with the USPTO and there may be questions about its secondary meaning. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Here, I will only note that the Scalia dissent says almost nothing about the text and original meaning of the Takings Clause, and therefore doesn't tell us anything about why he chose not to join Thomas. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:11 am
It cites Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
