Search for: "Means v. Peterson et al"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Third, and perhaps most important, in New Jersey, attorneys are not generally allowed to communicate with a represented party directly.[1] Expert witnesses are usually considered as agents of the parties that retained them, which means that such witnesses are also not free to communicate directly with the adverse parties or its counsel. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
Olivier v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
What the Bush Veto Means (July 19, 2006)125. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
They link their proposal to hypothetical EU debt issuance of 10 percent of EU GDP; the European Council recently adopted a borrowing plan of 5.4 percent of EU GDP.[8] Contrary to this recommendation, however, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire panned the idea of bringing back the French wealth tax that was abandoned in 2018.[9] Additionally, Norway (although not an EU country for purposes of the Landais et al. proposal) recognized the need to adjust its wealth tax during the… [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, What the Bush Veto Means (July 19, 2006)37. [read post]
