Search for: "Means v. Stocker"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
A departure from the normal costs rules would likely mean that individuals whose ECHR Article 8 rights had been infringed would lose any redress, save in high value claims. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation: context… [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
There has been only one full libel trial, Stocker v Stocker (the judge awarded £5,000 damages which the claimant turned down). [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Stocker v Stocker [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) (Mitting J) – the claimant succeeded in a claim based on defamatory comments by his ex-wife which she had made in exchanges on a public part of his new girlfriend’s Facebook page. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
On Thursday 24 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:58 am
Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 A determination of meaning following a Facebook post from a divorcee regarding her ex-husband allegedly trying to strangle her. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
This means it is not primarily equipped to deal with collective aspects of identity, such as race.[3] Perhaps this is because the “ordinary, reasonable reader” has neither race nor gender: a construct recognised as potential problematic “in key contexts that involve ‘culturally polarized understandings of fact’”.[4] In seeking to universalise the human experience, the hypothetical referee at the centre of defamation law overlooks and erases… [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 January 2019 (UKSC) [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
Trials We understand that there are 10 media law trials listed for this term: 17 October 2017, Brown v Bower & anr listed for half a day, trial of preliminary issue as to meaning and defamatory tendency (see [2017] EMLR 24) 17 October 2017, Butt v Home Office listed for half a day. 18 October 2017, Soobhan v Bandal, listed for 3 days 24 October 2017, Decker v Hopcraft & anr listed for 2 days. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
On 9 July 2018, the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am
And finally…II In Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474, Rares and Rangiah JJ of the Federal Court of Australia cited Lord Kerr in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 at [43] who said: …it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet“. [read post]
13 May 2019, 11:33 am
The following passage from the UK Supreme Court’s April 2019 decision in Stocker v Stocker[2019] UKSC 17 illustrates: ‘I agree with that, particularly the observation that it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet; it is likewise unwise to parse a Facebook posting for its theoretically or logically deducible meaning. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
The Privacy Law Blog has a post “What Does Brexit Mean for Data Protection? [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
On 21 and 22 January 2016 there was a PTR in the case of Stocker v Stocker before Nicol J. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:54 pm
The Seventh Day Adventist case, decided in 2000 (Stocker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The same court confirmed the importance of context in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, where the fact that publication was in a Facebook post was critical, as Facebook is ‘a casual medium; it is in the nature of conversation rather than carefully chosen expression; and that it is pre-eminently one in which the reader reads and passes on’ (Lord Kerr, para. 43). [read post]
